SRC vs G&G

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 14:47

as the title says, I'm kinda torn between getting a SRC http://www.shootsoft.ca/clearsoft/pr...roducts_id=298

and a G&G
http://www.shootsoft.ca/clearsoft/pr...roducts_id=166
my problem is necessarily price, but more of which is the better buy. I'm assuming that the SRC being quite more would be more reliable. Although I have not heard bad things about G&G either
please if you can give any insight into this matter it would help

-Trooper- · August 14th, 2010, 15:14

I hope this helps
http://www.007airsoft.com/gngvssrc.htm

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 15:20

hmm interesting, guess SRC is the way to go then. but really dont hear much about them

Amos · August 14th, 2010, 15:24

I'd choose G&G.

I've seen a couple SRC.. and alot of things are ass-backwards in there.

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 15:27

how so?

Amos · August 14th, 2010, 15:29

One piece hop-ups in bodies designed for two piece hop-ups, little external bits not lining up properly..

G&G has a much better external fit and finish and the only thing you really need to change is the piston head.

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 15:31

expensive? also hear that G&G lower reciever will crack or whatever.
though I'm assuming i could just get a metal lower?

cjboi · August 14th, 2010, 16:03

I'd say 50/50 because I like SRC internally and I also like G&G externally. Both version can crack since the one you can get are basically CAS version. If you get age verified here, then you can get full black guns. I know one of my friend has a G&G mp5 and M4, internally the air seal suck. But like what AMOS said basically it just need a new piston head. I only like the SRC G36 and I know for sure that SRC m4 and AK are TM compatible. Im guessing the SRC G36 are TM compatible too since TM, CA mags fit well in the SRC G36 mag-well. With G&G AK receiver you have to get G&G AK receiver, unless you modify the G&P AK receiver. The G&G m4 needs a lil bit of modification if you plan to change it to full metal, unless you get the G&G m4 metal receiver.

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 16:23

hmm, I guess i might as well go with G&G, and with some of the saved money pick up upgrades and fixes for it. thanks guys

Jsofter · August 14th, 2010, 17:29

G&G, my src is garbage. Take down sucks, and lots of parts come totaly f'ed up. The inner barrel on most src's come with a bend so dont expect accuracy even though its a tight bore, and the hop up absolutely sucks.

G&G is just better and more people have experience with it.

kennyclone · August 14th, 2010, 17:46

thanks, I'm fairly certain I'll get a G&G now. is it possible to replace the front sight with this one? I prefer a flip down sight.
http://torontoairsoft.com/product.php?id_product=114

BobbyDangerous · August 14th, 2010, 18:33

I have a G&G and it's pretty clutch..

martin2112 · August 14th, 2010, 23:31

I have a G&G G4 CQB-R, tinted lower receiver. Stock, it shoots 340 FPS - perfect for CQB limits.
Effective range is about 100 feet, using 0.2g, calm winds. You could lob it to 120 feet.

At 100 feet, I hit a square foot target 100% of the time. Save a few flyers - I do recycle my BBs a few times...

Equiped with an EOTECH replica, shooting standing, I get 1.5" groupings at 28 feet.

Mine came with rail covers, vertical foregrip and iron sights.

It's my first and only AEG, but I think it's a solid weapon. There is very little barrel wobble. It sometimes misfeed on full auto, but mainly due to lack of tension in the highcap mag spring. You just need to wind again and shoot.

I saw the video of SRC vs G&G: G&G shoots at a realistic rate-of-fire. The SRC is faster than a real M4. If you stick a 9.4V battery in your G&G, it will shoot just as fast, at the potential expense of lifespan.

My only beef would be with the Crane stock, in which it's very difficult to fish the wires without damaging them seriously (read: severing). Even the guy in the video explaning how to change the battery does not succeed and finally gives up! ROTF!

Good for a laugh: YouTube- How to install G&G GR15 Raider Battery to the Crane Stock - Airsoft Tutorial by HitGuns.com

kennyclone · August 15th, 2010, 00:44

ah, haha well I'm pretty set on a G&G but thanks, and yea crane stocks kinda piss me off my old JG had that problem but it kinda fell apart

Redzephyr · August 15th, 2010, 13:44

Hopefully you have better luck with G&G than I did. I bought an AK, took it home, and after literally ten shots one of the gears exploded.

Being a total noob, I couldn't figure out what had happened and didn't dare take it apart to find out (the grinding noise certainly didn't sound so great) and so marched back to the shop as soon as I could. The fella' took it apart and a dozen little pieces fell out, much to my dismay.

I've been trying (with little success) to return the damn thing and get my money back. The gundoc is cool, but I'm starting to think that the shopkeeper is avoiding me. Gah, for a bit more cash I could've gotten a friggin' RS...

Home	Forums	Register	Gallery	FAQ	Calendar
Retailers	Community	News/Info	International Retailers	IRC	Today's Posts

British Columbia	Alberta
BCAC	EAR
Op-For	JOC
Northern Arms Airsoft	Skunkworx Airsoft
Airsoft Kelowna	RAAT
Prince George Airsoft	Manitoba
Saskatchewan	MAA
SK Airsoft	Ontario
PDW	Airsoft Ottawa
South Sask Mercs	Snow Dragons
Quebec	1st Ranger Platoon
PQAC	Wolfpack Tactical
1st Pathfinders Regiment	TTAC3
Quebec Airsoft
MTX Airsoft	Atlantic
FAQc	Atlantic Airsoft

August 14th, 2010, 14:47	#1
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	SRC vs G&G as the title says, I'm kinda torn between getting a SRC http://www.shootsoft.ca/clearsoft/pr...roducts_id=298 and a G&G http://www.shootsoft.ca/clearsoft/pr...roducts_id=166 my problem is necessarily price, but more of which is the better buy. I'm assuming that the SRC being quite more would be more reliable. Although I have not heard bad things about G&G either please if you can give any insight into this matter it would help

August 14th, 2010, 15:14	#2
-Trooper- a.k.a. Egria Trader rating Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vancouver	I hope this helps http://www.007airsoft.com/gngvssrc.htm __________________ PURVEYOR OF FINE PARACORD PRODUCTS www.beaconconceptsco.com Click Here For ASC Thread Team GHOSTS - G86

August 14th, 2010, 15:24	#4
Amos Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Tokushima, Japan	I'd choose G&G. I've seen a couple SRC.. and alot of things are ass-backwards in there. __________________ Custom Builds: FA3674U Krinkov G3SD6

August 14th, 2010, 15:20	#3
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	hmm interesting, guess SRC is the way to go then. but really dont hear much about them

August 14th, 2010, 15:27	#5
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	how so?

August 14th, 2010, 15:29	#6
Amos Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Tokushima, Japan	One piece hop-ups in bodies designed for two piece hop-ups, little external bits not lining up properly.. G&G has a much better external fit and finish and the only thing you really need to change is the piston head. __________________ Custom Builds: FA3674U Krinkov G3SD6

August 14th, 2010, 15:31	#7
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	expensive? also hear that G&G lower reciever will crack or whatever. though I'm assuming i could just get a metal lower?

August 14th, 2010, 16:03	#8
cjboi Trader rating Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: manitoba	I'd say 50/50 because I like SRC internally and I also like G&G externally. Both version can crack since the one you can get are basically CAS version. If you get age verified here, then you can get full black guns. I know one of my friend has a G&G mp5 and M4, internally the air seal suck. But like what AMOS said basically it just need a new piston head. I only like the SRC G36 and I know for sure that SRC m4 and AK are TM compatible. Im guessing the SRC G36 are TM compatible too since TM, CA mags fit well in the SRC G36 mag-well. With G&G AK receiver you have to get G&G AK receiver, unless you modify the G&P AK receiver. The G&G m4 needs a lil bit of modification if you plan to change it to full metal, unless you get the G&G m4 metal receiver.

August 14th, 2010, 16:23	#9
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	hmm, I guess i might as well go with G&G, and with some of the saved money pick up upgrades and fixes for it. thanks guys

August 14th, 2010, 17:29	#10
Jsofter Trader rating Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: calgary alberta	G&G, my src is garbage. Take down sucks, and lots of parts come totaly f'ed up. The inner barrel on most src's come with a bend so dont expect accuracy even though its a tight bore, and the hop up absolutely sucks. G&G is just better and more people have experience with it.

August 14th, 2010, 17:46	#11
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	thanks, I'm fairly certain I'll get a G&G now. is it possible to replace the front sight with this one? I prefer a flip down sight. http://torontoairsoft.com/product.php?id_product=114

August 14th, 2010, 18:33	#12
BobbyDangerous Trader rating Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Oshawa	I have a G&G and it's pretty clutch.. __________________ -Dangerous- BA Level 3 Certified

August 14th, 2010, 23:31	#13
martin2112 a.k.a martind2112 Trader rating Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: St-Philippe (Rive-Sud de Montréal), Québec, Canada	My quick G&G GR16 CQB-R review. I have a G&G G4 CQB-R, tinted lower receiver. Stock, it shoots 340 FPS - perfect for CQB limits. Effective range is about 100 feet, using 0.2g, calm winds. You could lob it to 120 feet. At 100 feet, I hit a square foot target 100% of the time. Save a few flyers - I do recycle my BBs a few times... Equiped with an EOTECH replica, shooting standing, I get 1.5" groupings at 28 feet. Mine came with rail covers, vertical foregrip and iron sights. It's my first and only AEG, but I think it's a solid weapon. There is very little barrel wobble. It sometimes misfeed on full auto, but mainly due to lack of tension in the highcap mag spring. You just need to wind again and shoot. I saw the video of SRC vs G&G: G&G shoots at a realistic rate-of-fire. The SRC is faster than a real M4. If you stick a 9.4V battery in your G&G, it will shoot just as fast, at the potential expense of lifespan. My only beef would be with the Crane stock, in which it's very difficult to fish the wires without damaging them seriously (read: severing). Even the guy in the video explaning how to change the battery does not succeed and finally gives up! ROTF! Good for a laugh: YouTube- How to install G&G GR15 Raider Battery to the Crane Stock - Airsoft Tutorial by HitGuns.com __________________ G&G G4 CQB-R, KWA M1911A1, Army R17 Glock, KSC USP .45 Tactical Last edited by martin2112; August 16th, 2010 at 03:42.. Reason: Added link

August 15th, 2010, 00:44	#14
kennyclone Trader rating Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Grande Prairie, AB	ah, haha well I'm pretty set on a G&G but thanks, and yea crane stocks kinda piss me off my old JG had that problem but it kinda fell apart

August 15th, 2010, 13:44	#15
Redzephyr Trader rating Join Date: May 2006 Location: Surrey, British Columbia	Hopefully you have better luck with G&G than I did. I bought an AK, took it home, and after literally ten shots one of the gears exploded. Being a total noob, I couldn't figure out what had happened and didn't dare take it apart to find out (the grinding noise certainly didn't sound so great) and so marched back to the shop as soon as I could. The fella' took it apart and a dozen little pieces fell out, much to my dismay. I've been trying (with little success) to return the damn thing and get my money back. The gundoc is cool, but I'm starting to think that the shopkeeper is avoiding me. Gah, for a bit more cash I could've gotten a friggin' RS...

SRC vs G&G

Airsoft Guns Discussion