|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
December 23rd, 2010, 09:55
|
#1 |
|
a.k.a. Submachinehead
|
Cybergun JG Liscenced AK-47 Review
Can anyone opine as to how the JG/Cybergun 'liscenced' real wood and metal AK-47 compares to the Real Sword version?
I was hoping someone might know of a review for the Cybergun because I can't seem to find a review of the non-tactical version. Also, I believe there are many cybergun versions of the AK and I'm having trouble locating a review of the right version.
__________________
у нас в рязани грибы с глазами их едят они глядят |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2010, 10:25
|
#2 |
|
Compared to Real Sword, no other airsoft AK comes close. Not even remotely so. I don't even have to see the other gun to be able to say that. It's kind of like comparing a Ford to a Mercedes.
That being said, JG guns aren't bad in general - probably the best of the lot when it comes to Chinese airsoft guns. I know that the DBoys steel / wood AKs are decent guns for the money, and I would say that these JG are probably quite similar.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2010, 13:53
|
#3 |
|
JG ak's externally are crap. If you want a cheap AK that looks good and will perform well get a full steel dboys or a mostly steel CYMA. JG internals are probably better, but internals are cheap, a nice receiver isn't.
__________________
 Not for glory, nor riches, nor honours, but for freedom alone, which no good man gives up except with his life. |
|
|
|
|
December 24th, 2010, 08:51
|
#4 |
|
a.k.a. Submachinehead
|
Thanks for the info, Gents. Certainly doesnt seem worth the savings.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
