|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
September 12th, 2009, 00:08 | #16 |
i was saying that tm is better not g&g
|
|
September 12th, 2009, 00:11 | #17 |
aka Halo64
|
|
September 12th, 2009, 00:19 | #18 |
Biggest downer I always find on TM's and TM style bodies is the take down... stupid having to unscrew every damn thing.... Thank god they didn't do that with the G3's.
__________________
-=LieutenantPliers=- |
|
September 28th, 2009, 06:39 | #19 |
TM's take down is real pain compared to G&G but id put my money TM because i do not appreciate the blowback feature as it looks too fake and adds additional parts to break. Besides if a gun is reliable then disassembling isnt too much of a hassle compared to a gun thats easy to disassemble because it breaks easy and ive heard that G&G isnt that reliable internally.
|
|
September 28th, 2009, 06:57 | #20 |
Indefinitely for the reliability I'd say TM, but if I were to choose any airsoft MP5, I'd either take a full metal ICS or Classic Army, due to quick take down and reliability.
__________________
-=LieutenantPliers=- |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|